← Search

Barbara Woodward

Arvada, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 37W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Barbara Woodward to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-07-30 · LTC-M TEAL · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ginny Laadt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · LTC-M TEAL · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ginny Laadt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-09 · LTC-M TEAL · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Shields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-02 · LTC-M TEAL · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pamela Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-04 · LTC-D YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pamela Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-21 · LTC-D YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ginny Laadt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-14 · LTC-D YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pamela Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-10-11 · #1 Doubles · with Pamela Schmidt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Mardi Robers / Delis Olsen
2025-10-10 · #1 Doubles · with Pamela Schmidt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-10-10 · #3 Doubles · with Ginny Laadt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-09-10 · #1 Doubles · with Pamela Schmidt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-08-07 · LTC-D GREEN · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ginny Laadt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
31.2%
10W–22L · 43.2% of games
6.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 60.3% of games
7.0
50%
13W–13L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 49% of the time
#3 Doubles
49%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
45%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer