← Search

Jeffrey Semon

Woburn, MA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 22W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Semon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-07-23 · WOB:You Sure?:Semon · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Sillman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · WOB:You Sure?:Semon · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Naftoly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-15 · WOB:You Sure?:Semon · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alan Kessler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · WOB:You Sure?:Semon · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marty Tourigny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-4
L
2026-06-23 · WOB:Locusts:Hastings · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rich Lieberman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-17 · WOB:Locusts:Hastings · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dustin Chao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · WOB:Locusts:Hastings · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rich Lieberman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
Brandon Bale / Ari Milstein
2026-06-04 · WOB:You Sure?:Semon · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexander Diaz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-26 · WOB:Locusts:Hastings · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marty Tourigny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-30 · Jeff Semon · #1 Singles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-30 · NEW:Newburyport:Naftoly · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marty Tourigny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-23 · WOB:Locusts:Hastings/Samuelson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dennis Fergusson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
35.7%
10W–18L · 45.6% of games
4.5
16%
8W–42L · 38.7% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 35.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
22 matches
#1 Singles
11%
10 matches
#2 Singles
10%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal