← Search

Chris Howard

Prescott, AZ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 23W–20L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Chris Howard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history43 matches
W
2026-08-16 · Prescott · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adriana Armesto Howard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-2
L
2026-07-12 · Prescott · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adriana Armesto Howard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-12 · PHX/Orchard/Lissner/65&O/8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kelly Davidson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-11 · NAZ/Khilnani/40&over/4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sterling Fetty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-28 · NAZ/Khilnani/40&over/4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffery Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Chris Shol / John Daniel Hopkins
2026-03-15 · PHX/Orchard/Lissner/65&O/8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Kueffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-14 · AVI · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luke Thesing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-22 · PHX/Orchard/Lissner/65&O/8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-02-08 · PHX/Orchard/Lissner/65&O/8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Lissner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-07 · AVI · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-01-31 · AVI · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-12-07 · NAZ/Brock/Mraz/55&over/8.0Mixed · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diane Brock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
80%
4W–1L · 67.5% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 62.8% of games
9.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 36.5% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams