← Search

Paul Smyth

— year-end
49 matches · 23W–26L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Paul Smyth to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
W
2026-07-13 · Sandozi: Minnesota Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nam Ho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-06 · Sandozi: Minnesota Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nick Rush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-15 · Sandozi: Minnesota Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Rickheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-09 · Peterson/ Leveris · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Leveris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · Peterson/ Leveris · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Austin Choe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-01 · Sandozi: Minnesota Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Rickheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-26 · Peterson/ Leveris · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nathan Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-18 · Sandozi: Minnesota Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irfan Sandozi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-12 · Peterson/ Leveris · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mickey Stein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
John Barnes / Mark Meyer
2026-05-11 · Sandozi: Minnesota Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Rickheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-05 · Peterson/ Leveris · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Garth Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-04 · Sandozi: Minnesota Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Rickheim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Teams35 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
50%
11W–11L · 51.2% of games
4.0
44.4%
12W–15L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams