← Search

Anthony Seim

Platte City, MO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 61W–29L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Anthony Seim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-08-19 · Stroede, John · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Derrick Field
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · Stroede, John · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Derrick Field
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-18 · Stroede, John · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tim Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-06 · KS/Lobatos/18&Over4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Seitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-06 · KS/Lobatos/18&Over4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Seitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · Stroede, John · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derrick Field
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-02 · KS/Seitz/40&Over4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Ritter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-11 · KS/Seitz/40&Over4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Seitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · KS/Seitz/40&Over4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Seitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-14 · Thyagarajan, Jagannath · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-13 · HOA/Andrews/40&over9.0X · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Deborah Fabrizius mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-02-28 · Thyagarajan, Jagannath · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
50%
7W–7L · 51.1% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
68.4%
26W–12L · 58% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 57.4% of games
9.0mixed
77.3%
17W–5L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
24 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert