← Search

Janet Mcpheely

Duluth, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
23 matches · 11W–12L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Janet Mcpheely to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
W
2026-06-04 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Pittman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 6-4
L
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-12-12 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Peel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2024-12-03 · TPC Sugarloaf (Patrece May)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2024-05-16 · TPC Sugarloaf (Sandy Elliott)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meylin Gonzalez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2024-01-10 · TPC Sugarloaf (Patrece May)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Rayl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2024-01-02 · TPC Sugarloaf (Patrece May)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiersten Greeff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 6-3
L
2023-12-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joyce Larkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2023-11-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Barger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2023-11-28 · TPC Sugarloaf (Patrece May)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Rayl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-11-07 · TPC Sugarloaf (Patrece May)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Silvia Shingleton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 6-3
L
2023-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandy Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 55.3% of games
4.0
25%
3W–9L · 40.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
30%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams