← Search

David Hilsabeck

Durham, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 6W–24L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add David Hilsabeck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
L
2026-07-30 · SRochkind-UNC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Polly Hilsabeck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-16 · SRochkind-UNC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Zeph mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-26 · SRochkind-UNC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Polly Hilsabeck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-20 · SRochkind-UNC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bradley Hubinek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-13 · SRochkind-UNC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robert Crane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-11 · SRochkind65-UNC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Philip Levy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-06 · SRochkind-UNC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-04 · SRochkind-UNC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ken Eaton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-29 · SRochkind65-UNC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ken Eaton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-20 · SRochkind-UNC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Weissler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-15 · SRochkind65-UNC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Rochkind
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · SRochkind65-UNC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ralph Gildehaus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–5L · 28.2% of games
3.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 29.3% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 42.8% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert