← Search

Katie Figgie

— year-end
175 matches · 109W–66L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Katie Figgie to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history175 matches
W
2026-07-09 · Carefree, Karlin/Bonadonna · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Haynor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · LI: Dix Hills, Capilets · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gina Hagedorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-25 · LI: Dix Hills, Capilets · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Antonella Karlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · Carefree, Karlin/Bonadonna · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Antonella Karlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · LI: Dix Hills, Capilets · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Diann Starcke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-20 · Carefree, Karlin/Bonadonna · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Antonella Karlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2
W
2026-03-23 · Moynihan/Nelson · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mitchell Low mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-02 · Moynihan/Nelson · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mitchell Low mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-01-06 · Manhattan: Moynihan/Untch · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mitchell Low mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-10-27 · Manhattan: Moynihan/Untch · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mitchell Low mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-19 · Point Set, Blue · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Antonella Karlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-17 · Long Beach, McKenzie/Simpson · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mitchell Low mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Teams50 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 60.1% of games
4.5
73.8%
62W–22L · 57.4% of games
5.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 44.2% of games
8.0mixed
51.5%
17W–16L · 49.1% of games
9.0mixed
55.2%
16W–13L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
23 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer