← Search

Gail Larkin

Lilburn, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 29W–40L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Gail Larkin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
L
2026-07-12 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-21 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-17 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-31 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauralee Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-01-17 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-13 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laureen McFadden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-06 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alicia Rhyne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-22 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Necole Jackson-DeJoie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-15 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tomeka Blackmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-08 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alicia Rhyne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 4-6
L
2025-07-15 · Mountain Park (Melanie Freeman)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Ellison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6
L
2025-07-14 · Mountain Park (Melanie Freeman)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rashidah Hasan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
64.3%
18W–10L · 57.4% of games
4.0
26.8%
11W–30L · 41.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 48% of the time
#1 Singles
48%
33 matches
#2 Singles
16%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert