← Search

Peter Teal

Billings, MT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 6W–16L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Peter Teal to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
L
2026-07-12 · 4.5 Qualifying Team · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with J Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-11 · 4.5 Qualifying Team · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with J Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-09 · Vraalag · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Jackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-08 · Vraalag · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Jackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-09 · Montana/Vroman/55&Over · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Keith Polesky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-08-09 · Montana/Vroman/55&Over · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Keith Polesky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-03-02 · Billings · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anna Collins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-03-01 · Billings · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lynn George mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
Austin Stege / Katherine Plowman
2025-03-01 · Billings · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lynn George mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-02-28 · Billings · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lynn George mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
David Bowman / Tom van Denover
2024-09-14 · #2 Doubles · with Mark Odell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Jeffrey Wood / Mark Phillips
2024-09-13 · #1 Doubles · with Jimmy Vroman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
75%
6W–2L · 56.1% of games
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0%
0W–8L · 31.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova