← Search

Mindy Blakeslee

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 81W–40L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Mindy Blakeslee to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history121 matches
W
2026-09-11 · STC oldies but goodies-Suver · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lisa Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-07-12 · NWW-STC-Suver · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Ebel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · with Lisa Black championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-2
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Dayna Guizzetti championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Dayna Guizzetti championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Lisa Black championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-20 · NWW-STC-Suver · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stephen Rosen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Colby White / Melissa Cole
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · with Kevin Young championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
Steve Pittman / Tamara Simone
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · with Kevin Young championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Sharon Runk / Nelson Vale Perez
2026-03-13 · #1 Doubles · with Eric Freeman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-28 · STC-Suver · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-02-01 · STC-Suver · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Liz Suver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams65 teams · 2001–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.5
71.4%
30W–12L · 58.5% of games
5.0
30%
3W–7L · 42% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 62.6% of games
10.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 62.6% of games
9.0mixed
100%
11W–0L · 65.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova