← Search

Wendy Coles

— year-end
171 matches · 72W–99L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Wendy Coles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
W
2026-04-15 · Etzold (Royal Palm) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosy Bild
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-10 · Cook (Royal Palm) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with ISABEL RICO PASTOR
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-06 · Cook (Royal Palm) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Josette Lahoud
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-03 · Etzold (Royal Palm) · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Zagorski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Garbine Guerrero / Dasha Moser
2026-04-02 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Oliveira
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-0
L
2026-03-17 · #5 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Bashein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-11 · Etzold (Royal Palm) · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monika Martins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-09 · Cook (Royal Palm) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lourdes Salazar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-05 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Josette Lahoud
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-02 · Cook (Royal Palm) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lourdes Salazar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-25 · Etzold (Royal Palm) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monika Martins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-02-19 · #4 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Josette Lahoud
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams28 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
47.4%
37W–41L · 51.1% of games
4.0
36.4%
8W–14L · 43.4% of games
4.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.6% of games
7.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 52.2% of games
7.5
30%
9W–21L · 46.9% of games
8.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 38.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 27% of the time
#3 Doubles
27%
46 matches
#1 Singles
21%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
22 matches
#3 Female Doubles
6%
10 matches
#5 Female Doubles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe