← Search

Cindy Fitton

Hellertown, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
229 matches · 58W–171L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cindy Fitton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history229 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Racquettes 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Unglaub
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-09 · Racquettes 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Unglaub
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · Team Caravaggio · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Antonia Tripp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-05 · Racquettes 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Unglaub
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · Team Caravaggio · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Ashworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-25 · Team Caravaggio · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robyn McNeil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-18 · Team Caravaggio · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robyn McNeil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-07-18 · Racquettes 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shoshana Gosselin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-28 · Team Caravaggio · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Antonia Tripp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-06-20 · Racquettes 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-20 · Racquet Scientists · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracey Cousins-Ledwidge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-30 · Team Caravaggio · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robyn McNeil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
37.5%
9W–15L · 44.7% of games
3.5
31%
18W–40L · 43.8% of games
4.0
5.6%
2W–34L · 27.1% of games
7.0
42%
21W–29L · 45.4% of games
8.0
10.9%
5W–41L · 32.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
114 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
32 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
11 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert