← Search

Adam Hannaford

Tulsa, OK
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 94W–35L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Adam Hannaford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
L
2026-09-04 · Stone/GR/mixed tri · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Marie Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
Ashley Torres / Justin Hall
2026-08-23 · Stone/GR/mixed tri · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kendall Ellsworth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-19 · Cuadra/GR/tri 4.0 M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jose Angel Mora Ceballos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
Ian McElwain / Julia Parkhill
2026-08-16 · Stone/GR/mixed tri · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelly Mason Uzzel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-14 · Stone/GR/mixed tri · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Marie Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-20 · Cuadra/GR/tri 4.0 M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gregory Kopervos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-17 · Stone/GR/mixed tri · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Hayli Leavitt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-26 · Tulsa/Cuadra/18&over7.0X · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kendall Ellsworth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · Jones/TTC 18s 4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julio Cuadra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-12 · Tulsa/Cuadra/18&over7.0X · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Krista Sessions mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · Jones/TTC 18s 4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brad Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-29 · Tulsa/Cuadra/18&over7.0X · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Krista Sessions mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.1% of games
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
77.4%
41W–12L · 60.4% of games
4.0
75%
6W–2L · 50% of games
5.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 57.8% of games
6.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 63% of games
7.0mixed
64.7%
22W–12L · 56.4% of games
8.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
25 matches
#1 Singles
8%
10 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova