← Search

Brenda House

Georgetown, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
167 matches · 75W–92L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Brenda House to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history167 matches
L
2026-08-02 · Berry Creekers 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doug Arnold mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-19 · Berry Creekers 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Geisler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · with Petra Utter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · with Petra Utter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-16 · Berry Creekers 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doug Arnold mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · Berry Creekers 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lee Heaton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-30 · Supreme Court · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sylette Kitchen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-13 · Supreme Court · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sylette Kitchen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-23 · Berry Creekers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Derek Winegar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-28 · Supreme Court · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Petra Utter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · Supreme Court · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shawnley Walton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-23 · Supreme Court · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jami Boccella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
56%
56W–44L · 51.3% of games
4.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 36.2% of games
7.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 42.4% of games
7.0mixed
31.2%
10W–22L · 48.1% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
35 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova