← Search

Kevin Goldner

— year-end
11 matches · 10W–1L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Kevin Goldner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history11 matches
W
Laurent Huguenin / Gordon Mather
2026-07-01 · Queen City · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Berk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
William De Galbert / Gordon Mather
2026-06-27 · Queen City · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Berk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
Mehmet Suha Gulerman / Matt McClish
2026-06-20 · Queen City · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Spence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Richard Garth / Greg Warner
2026-06-06 · Queen City · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Berk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2024-07-20 · Queen City · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Berk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-06-15 · Queen City · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Berk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-06-08 · Queen City · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Berk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 5-3
W
2023-07-29 · Queen City · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brandon Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 6-3
W
2023-06-10 · Queen City · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pablo Arce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
Daniel Gibson II / David Gibson
2022-06-18 · Queen City · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John McPhillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2022-06-04 · Queen City · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John McPhillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Teams5 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 65.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 73% of the time
#1 Doubles
73%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer