← Search

Tim Mullin

— year-end
209 matches · 109W–100L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tim Mullin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history209 matches
W
2026-05-04 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karl Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-18 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-11 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Albert Quimson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
Richard van Diepen / Daniel Lee
2026-03-28 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karl Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-14 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karl Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-03-07 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Keller Ii
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-21 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Keller Ii
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-01-03 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karl Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-12-13 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Oraee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-22 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Oraee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-11-08 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Stimson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-11-01 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randy Kondler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
73.2%
60W–22L · 57.9% of games
4.5
20.8%
5W–19L · 38.4% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
45.5%
15W–18L · 47% of games
8.0mixed
42.5%
17W–23L · 48.3% of games
8.5mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
57 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
4 matches
#2 Male Doubles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert