← Search

Jim McMahan

Columbia, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 18W–50L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jim McMahan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
L
2026-06-21 · CTL65/Dingle/GV · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Felecia Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-12 · CTL65/Dingle/GV · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Felecia Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Henry Timms
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-05 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charles Appleby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-12 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Blake Rochester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gregg Tarrance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-11-06 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rod Giess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
Chuck Henderson / David Lee
2025-10-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Stringer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gregg Tarrance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Doris Mosley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alice McMahan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alice McMahan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
24.5%
13W–40L · 39.4% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.3% of games
3.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 36.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams