← Search

Gena Marie Johnson

Bloomfield Hills, MI
3.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 22W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gena Marie Johnson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
L
Laura Barnett / Evonne Mcgivern
2026-07-07 · BT-Danowski 40s 3.0 NW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heejin Yim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-13 · 1FAC-Johnson 65 WOMEN COMBO F5 · #2 Doubles · with Christine Arrowood
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-23 · 1FAC-Johnson 65 WOMEN COMBO F5 · #2 Doubles · with Leslie Roth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-15 · 1FAC-Johnson 65 WOMEN COMBO F5 · #2 Doubles · with Leslie Roth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-07 · 1FAC-Johnson 65 WOMEN COMBO F5 · #2 Doubles · with Christine Arrowood
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-18 · 1FAC-Johnson 65 WOMEN COMBO F5 · #3 Doubles · with Malin Aladlouni
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-11 · 1FAC-Johnson 65 WOMEN COMBO F5 · #1 Doubles · with Carrie Weingartz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-27 · 4BT-DANOWSKI 30NW TU 40&O SEM F1 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Renee Banas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-13 · 4BT-DANOWSKI 30NW TU 40&O SEM F1 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Renee Banas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-12-15 · 4FAC-JOHNSON 65WOMEN SEM F5 · #3 Doubles · with Kimberly Danowski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-12-07 · 4FAC-JOHNSON 65WOMEN SEM F5 · #2 Doubles · with Leslie Roth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2024-11-09 · 4FAC-JOHNSON 65WOMEN SEM F5 · #2 Doubles · with Leslie Roth
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
38.9%
14W–22L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 59% of the time
#3 Doubles
59%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer