← Search

Judith MacKenzie

— year-end
144 matches · 64W–80L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Judith MacKenzie to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
W
2026-06-18 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Tegano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-14 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timora Cereghino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-07 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelley Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-30 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Shier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-16 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Tegano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-02 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Terri Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-12-18 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Tegano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-12-11 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timora Cereghino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-04 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timora Cereghino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-12-02 · SPANISH TRAIL · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timora Cereghino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-11-20 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timora Cereghino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Patricia Hawkins / Annabel Elliott
2025-11-18 · SPANISH TRAIL · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timora Cereghino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
50%
5W–5L · 56.4% of games
4.0
37.9%
25W–41L · 45% of games
7.0
62.1%
18W–11L · 52.1% of games
8.0
48.4%
15W–16L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
38 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova