← Search

Cheryl Schwartz

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 40W–104L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cheryl Schwartz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
L
2026-06-04 · SPANISH TRAIL #1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Horns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-29 · SPANISH TRAIL #1 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Marisa Ptak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Hedy Kurland / Margo Sackheim
2026-04-09 · Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Danner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-12 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Rusk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Vedah Halberg / Candi Baranski
2026-03-03 · Volley Girls · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Danner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
Dawn Collias / Julie Winrich
2026-02-26 · Volley Girls · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Danner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-01-15 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peggy Latour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-01-08 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peggy Latour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-12-04 · SPANISH TRAIL #1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Horns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-12-01 · DTC #3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-13 · SPANISH TRAIL #1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheila Stetts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-12 · DTC #3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Cortez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
12.5%
4W–28L · 37.7% of games
4.0
24.3%
17W–53L · 39% of games
6.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
50%
14W–14L · 48.3% of games
8.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
35 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova