← Search

Debbie Jones

LaGrange, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 7W–9L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Debbie Jones to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
L
2025-09-21 · Chata/Lesa Cleaveland · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anita Holle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-09-14 · Chata/Lesa Cleaveland · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sheri Bland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-11-17 · Chata/Lesa Cleaveland · #1 Doubles · with Julie Patton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-11-10 · Chata/Lesa Cleaveland · #1 Doubles · with Tricia Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-11-03 · Chata/Lesa Cleaveland · #1 Doubles · with Tricia Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2020-08-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dee Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 6-7
L
2020-07-21 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dee Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 2-4
W
2020-07-17 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dee Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2020-07-14 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dee Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Jan Davenport / Debbie Taylor
2018-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Marchuk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 3-6
W
Linda Johnson / Michelle Hays
2018-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Asbury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 6-1
W
2018-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Asbury
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 55.2% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
19%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe