← Search

Gina Sambus

Garden City, NY
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
72 matches · 47W–25L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gina Sambus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
W
2026-01-28 · Point Set, Chapman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Sambus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-20 · Point Set, Chapman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Sambus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
Anh Nguyen / Mandy Lee
2025-10-24 · Point Set, Chapman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Sambus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-21 · Point Set, Crain · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Doherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-07-22 · Point Set, Siler/Mao · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Doherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2024-07-18 · Point Set, Siler/Mao · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Doherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
N/A
2023-07-31 · Point Set, Thomas/Siler · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Vendetti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2023-07-05 · Point Set, Thomas/Siler · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Siler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2023-06-17 · Point Set, Thomas/Siler · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Siler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2023-06-02 · Point Set, Coulter/Siler · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2023-05-31 · Point Set, Coulter/Siler · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Vendetti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2022-07-26 · Point Set, Thomas/Siler · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Siler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
89.5%
17W–2L · 69.5% of games
4.0
51.2%
22W–21L · 49.5% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
9 matches
#2 Singles
7%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova