← Search

Steve Swan

Clackamas, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 28W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Steve Swan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
L
2025-11-08 · LOTC-Lavios/Hesslink · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Preston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-01 · LOTC-Lavios/Hesslink · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Hesslink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-10-12 · LOTC-Lavios/Hesslink · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ken Dragoon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2025-10-10 · LOTC-Lavios/Hesslink · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Hesslink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-16 · CRRC-Polacik/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tony Tully
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-03-09 · CRRC-Polacik/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tony Tully
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-03-07 · CRRC-Polacik/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Hooker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-16 · CRRC-Polacik/Johnson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tony Tully
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-01-12 · CRRC-Polacik/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Polacik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-01-03 · CRRC-Polacik/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tony Tully
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-05-18 · CRRC-Glenn · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Glenn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-04-06 · CRRC-Glenn · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dianna Kaady mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2017–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
92.9%
13W–1L · 65% of games
4.0
11.8%
2W–15L · 38.4% of games
7.0
25%
2W–6L · 47% of games
7.0mixed
39.1%
9W–14L · 45% of games
8.0mixed
11.8%
2W–15L · 34.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer