← Search

Brenda Lott

INVERNESS, MS
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
67 matches · 34W–33L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Brenda Lott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-08-26 · Lott-ICC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elyette Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-20 · Adams-ICC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Vickie L Dodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-12 · Adams ICC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Susan Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
Liz Clements / Lisa King
2026-08-06 · Vickie Dodd · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Paula Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-03 · Adams-ICC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Vickie L Dodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-21 · Vickie Dodd · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amanda Azlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-06 · Adams ICC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Paula Simmons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-22 · Simmons-ICC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Landwirth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-17 · Adams ICC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Leigh Street
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-09 · Simmons-ICC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Lyon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-03 · Simmons-ICC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Landwirth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-12 · Simmons-ICC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Toler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 58.9% of games
3.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 55.5% of games
3.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 61.5% of games
4.0
17.6%
3W–14L · 32.9% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 50% of games
3.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer