← Search

Caroline Mathes

Rome, ME
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 13W–14L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Caroline Mathes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
W
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alycia Nored
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regina Coppens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Land
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Land
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-08 · Acopi:Moss · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Saulter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-08 · Acopi:Moss · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Saulter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-02-21 · Acopi:Moss · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regina Coppens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-02-08 · Acopi:Moss · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-02-08 · Acopi:Moss · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Cahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-24 · Acopi:Moss · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Land
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-12-21 · ACOPI:Holm · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robyn Graziano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-11-15 · ACOPI:Holm · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracey Cahn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 52.2% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 37.4% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 53.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer