← Search

Ryan Rathe

— year-end
122 matches · 60W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ryan Rathe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
L
2026-08-11 · Escamilla Rathe · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nate Goodwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-08 · Escamilla/Fossler · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nathanial Rathe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-02 · Ek/Freeman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephan Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-18 · Ek/Freeman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Orr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-11 · Ek/Freeman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephan Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-10 · Escamilla/Fossler · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caleb Nielsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-20 · Escamilla/Fossler · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Midanier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-14 · Ek/Freeman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephan Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-07 · Ek/Freeman · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephan Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · Dean · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jae Sung Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Justin Gibson / John Miller
2026-04-30 · Ek/Freeman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Orr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · Dean · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Seth Kingery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 47.5% of games
3.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 32.5% of games
4.0
64.9%
50W–27L · 54.4% of games
4.5
13.3%
2W–13L · 39.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 46.3% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
29 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova