← Search

Kirk Thoman

Lancaster, PA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
299 matches · 152W–147L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Kirk Thoman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history299 matches
W
2026-09-13 · RCW - Ankeny · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lauren Witmer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-09-11 · Hempfield Hydrate with Hops - Brink · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristine Criswell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-26 · RCW - Campbell · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Saul Cohen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-19 · RCW Funnier than 24 - Bookman · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with James Moshos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Peter Nguyen / Nicholas May
2026-07-14 · RCW - Thoman/Brink · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Victor Fissella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-14 · RCW - Thoman/Brink · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Victor Fissella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · RCW - Campbell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andy Loose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-16 · RCW - Thoman/Brink · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Moyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-14 · RCW - Campbell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Saul Cohen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L
Michael Marinus Young / Emma Pickering
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · with Alexandra Short championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · RCW - Campbell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Saul Cohen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-04 · Hempfield - Crink · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alexandra Short mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
50.6%
40W–39L · 52.2% of games
8.0
36.8%
7W–12L · 48.9% of games
9.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.9% of games
8.0mixed
68.2%
60W–28L · 56.3% of games
9.0mixed
34.2%
13W–25L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
107 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
105 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
79 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
7 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert