← Search

Amber Jorgensen

Aurora, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
221 matches · 175W–46L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Amber Jorgensen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history221 matches
W
2026-05-26 · PCC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karina Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-12 · PCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shannon Doyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-21 · PCC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Colleen Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-14 · PCC GREEN · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
Priya Kanaparti
2025-09-06 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-09-06 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Tiffany Kasteler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-08-16 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-08-14 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-10 · PRC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jordan Rigberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-08-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Regina Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2025-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
97.2%
35W–1L · 74.1% of games
4.0
85.1%
57W–10L · 65.1% of games
4.5
45.2%
14W–17L · 48.9% of games
7.0mixed
81%
17W–4L · 60.4% of games
7.5mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 61.1% of games
8.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 60.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
69 matches
#1 Singles
30%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
33 matches
#2 Singles
7%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova