← Search

Barbara Beagles

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
182 matches · 97W–85L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Barbara Beagles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history182 matches
L
2026-08-24 · Strung Out 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Micah Vogt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · Penn Pals · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-09 · Penn Pals · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bonnie Stotland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · Penn Pals · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barb Harper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-06 · HCC Queen Bee’s · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelle Weston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-04 · HCC Queen Bee’s · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Barnum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-04-20 · HCC Queen Bee’s · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-04-08 · HCC Queen Bee’s · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-04-06 · HCC Queen Bee’s · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JoLyn Janecko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-01 · HCC Queen Bee’s · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Barnum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-03-30 · HCC Queen Bee’s · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-09 · Wilson Women · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cindy Duncan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
73.3%
55W–20L · 59% of games
4.0
25.8%
8W–23L · 41.7% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 35.9% of games
8.0
26.7%
4W–11L · 39.2% of games
7.5mixed
45%
9W–11L · 54% of games
8.0mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
35 matches
#1 Singles
6%
11 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer