← Search

Shari Levelle

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 63W–57L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Shari Levelle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-05-22 · SAC-Ko · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jihoon Bang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-08 · SAC-Ko · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jihoon Bang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · SAC-Ko · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arjun Bilakanti mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-01 · SAC-Gatzke · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Gatzke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-18 · SAC-Gatzke · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Gatzke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-17 · SAC-Harwood · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Means mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-11 · SAC-Gatzke · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Heberlein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-21 · SAC-Boyce · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothea Barnatan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-13 · SAC-Boyce · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothea Barnatan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-02-28 · SAC-Boyce · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Tellin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-5
L
2026-02-08 · SAC-Boyce · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Tellin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-31 · SAC-Boyce · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Gatzke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams112 teams · 2001–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
52.1%
25W–23L · 49.9% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.4% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
62.2%
23W–14L · 53.3% of games
8.0mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
25 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova