← Search

Nancy Hayes

— year-end
26 matches · 17W–9L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Nancy Hayes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
L
2026-06-08 · Belmont -Colgin · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lee Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-01 · Belmont -Colgin · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Zachary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-28 · Belmont -Colgin · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lee Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-04 · Belmont -Colgin · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Taft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-27 · Belmont -Colgin · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lee Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-20 · Belmont -Colgin · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lee Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-13 · Belmont -Colgin · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lee Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Joy Lareau / Maureen McGrath
2025-06-02 · Belmont - Colgin 8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lee Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Katherine Berry / Kimberly Giancaspro
2025-04-28 · Belmont - Colgin 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Zachary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-04-21 · Belmont - Colgin 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ella Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-10-05 · #2 Doubles · with Jane Colgin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
Elizabeth Rider / Abby Winship
2024-05-20 · 1 Belmont Colgin · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Colgin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Teams8 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.4% of games
8.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 56.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams