← Search

Suzanne Fries

— year-end
72 matches · 41W–31L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Suzanne Fries to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
L
2026-08-28 · Longwood-Connolly · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marion Earnhardt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-14 · Longwood-Connolly · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ana Laidman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-10 · Alberta Banks-Gravitt · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Linda Carpentier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · Alberta Banks-Gravitt · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alison Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Ritter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lecretia Scondras
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Barwig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Misty Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darla Light
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 6-7
L
2026-05-11 · NEGTA/Nancy Gravitt · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lecretia Scondras
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-04 · NEGTA/Nancy Gravitt · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lecretia Scondras
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-27 · NEGTA/Nancy Gravitt · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Darla Light
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Teams27 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 59% of games
4.0
53.6%
30W–26L · 50.6% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams