← Search

Bryan Newell

Kansas City, MO
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 14W–20L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Bryan Newell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
L
2026-04-27 · Schere, Adam · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Nicholas Grunauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-20 · Schere, Adam · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Austin Collazo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-16 · Schere, Adam · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Nicholas Grunauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-14 · Schere, Adam · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Adam Schere
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-12-18 · Team Globerman · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
Daniel Sauter
2024-12-13 · Team Globerman · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Geoffrey Diehl / Bret Schuler
2024-11-01 · Team Globerman · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Nicholas Grunauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-10-25 · Team Globerman · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Nicholas Grunauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-10-12 · Team Globerman · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Nicholas Grunauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Gary Rees / Andrew Dunn
2024-10-04 · Team Globerman · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Nicholas Grunauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-01-06 · Team Germain · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with A Germain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-12-01 · Team Germain · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Nico Sigloch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
73.7%
14W–5L · 60% of games
5.0
0%
0W–15L · 24% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
11 matches
#1 Singles
9%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match
#3 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova