← Search

Patricia Hurley

NEENAH, WI
0.0 year-end
50 matches · 18W–32L · seasons 2015–2022

Captains: add Patricia Hurley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
2022-06-08 · WI Adult 55&O 6.0 W GML FLAC Muldoon · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judith Bare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2021-07-15 · WI Adult 55&O 6.0 W GML Nass · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with KAREN CATOZZI
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
Kathryn Migliano / Cheryl Stollberg
2019-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Finch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2019-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandy Thies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Barbara Sauer / Shirley Johnson
2019-07-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maria Jaffe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
Jean Mercier / Nancy Precour
2019-07-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Zdeblick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
Barbara Sauer / Victoria Wirth
2019-07-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Rzyski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Rachel Hockemeyer / Lorie Rowe
2019-07-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Schuchardt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2019-06-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Muldoon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2019-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kay Beck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
GERDA MAHER / Tia Tongas
2019-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrea Farb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Joan Davies / Claire Calligure
2019-06-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Kort
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.8% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
43.2%
16W–21L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 68% of the time
#3 Doubles
68%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer