← Search

Jim Wescott

CHAPIN, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 41W–20L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jim Wescott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
L
2026-08-15 · LATA55\Mathews\CTFC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kemper Amick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-13 · LATA40/WESCOTT/CAMP · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lane Small
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
James Clark / Jim Redick
2026-08-13 · LATA55\Mathews\CTFC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cole Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · CTL (A) 4.0M 55 & Over (Wescott) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paula Howker Amick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · CTL (A) 4.0M 55 & Over (Wescott) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Foster mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-28 · LATA 4.0M 40 & Over (Zupon) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kay Wescott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-21 · LATA 4.0M 40 & Over (Zupon) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kay Wescott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-05-09 · CTL (A) 4.0M 55 & Over (Wescott) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kay Wescott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-04-28 · LATA 4.0M 18 & Over (Estes) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Stein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-22 · LATA40/Sinegar/CAMP · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with MARTIN CATOLICO
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-04-15 · LATA40/Sinegar/CAMP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Goolsby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-14 · LATA 4.0M 18 & Over (Estes) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Stein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
75%
21W–7L · 55.5% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 29.3% of games
7.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 68% of games
4.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams