← Search

Diana McCoy

Miami, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 86W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Diana McCoy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
L
2025-11-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Hewitson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-20 · #4 Female Doubles · 4.5 · with Kerri Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-10-14 · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Hewitson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-10 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kerri Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-09-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Viso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-19 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Hewitson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-09-12 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Hewitson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
N/A
2025-05-09 · McCoy (Dante Fascell) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-05-02 · McCoy (Dante Fascell) · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Kaskel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-05-01 · #6 Female Doubles · 4.5 · with Dilia Grossman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-04-22 · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Janna Dadesky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
Liana Rivas / Sabine Zerarka
2025-03-07 · McCoy (Dante Fascell) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dilia Grossman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
64.8%
57W–31L · 54.9% of games
4.5
60%
6W–4L · 60.3% of games
8.0
90%
9W–1L · 63.3% of games
8.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 66.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
5 matches
#6 Female Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal