← Search

James Crawford

Hampton Cove, AL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
14 matches · 6W–8L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add James Crawford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
L
2026-02-28 · Beckham · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael McLaughlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-26 · Beckham · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kody Ehlers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-02-18 · Beckham · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kody Ehlers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-08-21 · Laitinen · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Douglas Counter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-08-21 · Laitinen · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Douglas Counter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-08-18 · Laitinen · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mark Sommers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-04 · Laitinen · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mark Sommers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-01 · Campbell 4.5 18+ · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sandra Wiles mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-25 · Campbell 4.5 18+ · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sandra Wiles mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
Jennifer Wood / Jarrett Grubb
2025-06-11 · Campbell 4.5 18+ · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sandra Wiles mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-04-05 · Haliczer HSV Spring 25 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lafe Wallour
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-25 · Haliczer HSV Spring 25 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jarrett Grubb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 54.7% of games
8.5
25%
1W–3L · 37.3% of games
4.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova