← Search

Phillip Smith

— year-end
66 matches · 42W–24L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Phillip Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
L
2026-08-19 · West Homewood - Sellers/Scott · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jordan Means
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-05 · West Homewood - Sellers/Scott · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Terry Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · West Homewood - Sellers/Scott · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Terry Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-05-20 · Phillip Smith · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-18 · Homewood - Sellers · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robert Sellers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-25 · Phillip Smith · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-24 · Phillip Smith · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-23 · Phillip Smith · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-14 · Homewood - Sellers · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Wittmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-13 · Pelham Racquet Club - Chomicz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Chomicz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-10 · Phillip Smith · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-08 · Pelham Racquet Club - Chomicz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Tucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
Teams35 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
70.9%
39W–16L · 59.3% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 38.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
24 matches
#1 Singles
26%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova