← Search

Sara Hemmer

West Glacier, MT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 29W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sara Hemmer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Kalispell Tri · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Oehlerich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-30 · Kalispell Tri · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Oehlerich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-29 · Kalispell Tri · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Oehlerich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-29 · Kalispell Tri · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Oehlerich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-26 · Glacier Grit · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Bennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-25 · Glacier Grit · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tricia Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-25 · Glacier Grit · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Haigh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · Glacier Grit · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Torgerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Sarah Miller / Margaret Moffatt
2026-06-13 · Glacier Grit · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Haigh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-13 · Glacier Grit · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tricia Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-12 · Glacier Grit · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Bennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-12 · Glacier Grit · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Bennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 54.7% of games
4.0
55.6%
15W–12L · 54.2% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.5% of games
8.5mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 48.8% of games
9.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert