← Search

Vicki Clark

Edmonds, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
168 matches · 71W–97L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Vicki Clark to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history168 matches
L
2026-08-07 · HBSQ-Vitcovich · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Jolene Momcilovich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · HBSQ-Garfield/Rea · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Rutter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-07-31 · HBSQ-Vitcovich · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Fran Joy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-07-18 · HBSQ-Garfield/Rea · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Rutter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-17 · HBSQ-Vitcovich · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Jolene Momcilovich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · HBSQ-Garfield/Rea · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Don Robey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · HBSQ-Ageless Aces-Tameishi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Lusty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-03 · HBSQ-Ageless Aces-Tameishi · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bonnie Flock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-01 · HBSQ-Clark · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Hewitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-26 · HBSQ-Ageless Aces-Tameishi · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Heller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-05-08 · HBSQ-Clark · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Heller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-21 · HBSQ-Clark · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Hewitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 59.8% of games
3.0
38.9%
7W–11L · 49.6% of games
3.5
26.3%
10W–28L · 41.9% of games
7.0
51.6%
32W–30L · 50.9% of games
8.0
20%
2W–8L · 42% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 47.7% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
36 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer