← Search

Tami Malatek

— year-end
83 matches · 45W–38L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Tami Malatek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
W
2026-08-29 · CTL55/Simpson/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janet Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-12 · CTL65/Bull/CTFC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nan Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · CTL55/Simpson/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donna Bull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-08-05 · CTL65/Bull/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Debbie Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-01 · CTL55/Simpson/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donna Bull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-31 · CTL55/Simpson/CTFC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sharon Steinbacher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-07-29 · CTL65/Bull/CTFC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Donna Bull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · CTL40/Echols/CTFC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julian Horst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-22 · LATA65/HARE/TS · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alicia Amick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · LATA65/HARE/TS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sherri Greenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-27 · LATA 4.5W 18 & Over (Greenberg) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Laney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-11 · LATA65/HARE/TS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Hawkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
62.3%
38W–23L · 53.4% of games
7.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 44.9% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova