← Search

Sammie Sue Willenborg

— year-end
73 matches · 50W–23L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sammie Sue Willenborg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
W
2025-11-15 · CHARB-Enos/Taylor · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Wisthoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-11-02 · CHARB-Enos/Taylor · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Wisthoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-01 · CHARB-Enos/Taylor · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Wisthoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-10-24 · CHARB-Enos/Taylor · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Groenweghe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-09-20 · CHARB-Enos/Taylor · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tara Guimont
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-03-15 · CHARB-Enos/Taylor · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Groenweghe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-03-07 · CHARB-Enos/Taylor · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Groenweghe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-02-15 · CHARB-Enos/Taylor · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Wall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-02-01 · CHARB-Enos/Taylor · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Groenweghe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2025-01-18 · CHARB-Enos/Taylor · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Wall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-01-11 · CHARB-Enos/Taylor · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Wisthoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-01-04 · CHARB-Enos/Taylor · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Wisthoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Teams9 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
66%
33W–17L · 53.7% of games
7.0
77.3%
17W–5L · 58.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
46 matches
#1 Singles
18%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
10 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams