← Search

Mary Beth Mapes

Princeton, NJ
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 61W–82L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Beth Mapes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history143 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Super Senoritas · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Toni-Ann Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · Super Senoritas · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Nanci Levine championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · CENTRAL/Acing Gracefully · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nanci Levine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-18 · CENTRAL/Acing Gracefully · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mara Wilmot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-11 · CENTRAL/Acing Gracefully · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nanci Levine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-09 · PRC Fab Ladies · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Ronan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · PRC Fab Ladies · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy Singleton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · PRC Fab Ladies · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelley Berger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-18 · PRC Fab Ladies · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helene Fair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-12 · PRC Fab Ladies · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helene Fair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-11 · PRC Fab Ladies · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lorraine Samara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
0%
0W–8L · 32.2% of games
3.0
60%
9W–6L · 51.4% of games
3.5
42.3%
33W–45L · 46% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 26.2% of games
6.0
60%
3W–2L · 60.7% of games
7.0
51.9%
14W–13L · 51.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
31 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer