← Search

Lisa Bernhard

— year-end
216 matches · 91W–125L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Bernhard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history216 matches
W
2026-08-18 · Hempfield Fireballs - Bernhard · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Gailor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-17 · Hempfield Fireballs - Bernhard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Chase
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · Hempfield Fireballs - Bernhard · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Harkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · Hempfield Fireballs - Bernhard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Chase
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-16 · (CPD) Hempfield Fireballs - Bernhard · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Borza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · (CPD) Hempfield Fireballs - Bernhard · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Borza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-29 · Hempfield - Schlageter · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-25 · (CPD) Hempfield Fireballs - Bernhard · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carla Patberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-24 · Hempfield - Schlageter · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-28 · Hempfield Fireballs - Bernhard · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Giusy Milazzo Leanza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-29 · Hempfield - Baumer 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Frank Wagner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-03-22 · Hempfield - Baumer 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with MARK Webb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
Teams65 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
41.2%
14W–20L · 48.7% of games
3.5
13.6%
3W–19L · 37.1% of games
6.0
57.7%
15W–11L · 54% of games
7.0
31.6%
6W–13L · 45% of games
6.0mixed
56.9%
29W–22L · 52.3% of games
7.0mixed
34.7%
17W–32L · 43% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
98 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
42 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer