← Search

H Treak Tasker

Tulsa, OK
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 33W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add H Treak Tasker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
L
2026-05-12 · Hryshchuk/PH/4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Neale Pashley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-06 · Hryshchuk/PH/4.5M · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Neale Pashley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-02 · OKWC/Hryshchuk/PH/4.5M · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Neale Pashley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-10-13 · OKWC/Hryshchuk/PH/4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eddie Paez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2025-09-15 · OKWC/Hryshchuk/PH/4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Neale Pashley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-06-22 · Tasker/PH · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimberly Oliver mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2024-11-06 · Hryshchuk/PH · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Mannell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2024-10-09 · Hryshchuk/PH · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Neale Pashley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-10-01 · Hryshchuk/PH · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Curtis Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-09-18 · Hryshchuk/PH · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Neale Pashley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2024-06-14 · Tasker/PH · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimberly Oliver mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2024-05-20 · OK/Stan Swyden/55&over9.0M · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tim Ritchie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
58.3%
14W–10L · 52% of games
5.0
0%
0W–4L · 18.6% of games
9.0
80%
8W–2L · 58.2% of games
8.0mixed
42.3%
11W–15L · 47.7% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal