← Search

Rebecca Pate

— year-end
53 matches · 21W–32L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Pate to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-06-02 · Winter Haven City/ J. Edwards · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ana Gillespie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-19 · Winter Haven City/ J. Edwards · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan McGill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-12 · Winter Haven City/ J. Edwards · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Choe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
Elizabeth Wyman / Beth Jones
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · with Denise Saltman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · with Jackie Edwards championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · with Elizabeth Stevenson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · with Jackie Edwards championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-21 · Winter Haven City/ J. Edwards · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Choe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-02 · Polk/Edwards · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Stevenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-13 · Polk/Edwards · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nadine Pantano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-03-10 · City of WH - J. Edwards · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cassandra Brand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-05 · Polk/Edwards · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sharon Lockwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams12 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
44.4%
12W–15L · 53.9% of games
4.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 37.9% of games
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#1 Female Doubles
21%
11 matches
#2 Female Doubles
13%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer