← Search

Armand Gallanosa

Anderson, IN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 78W–50L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Armand Gallanosa to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
W
2025-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Neal Abdullah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-4
W
2025-07-12 · CIN X40 7.0 IRCD Poe · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Combs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dennis Poe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-05 · CIN X40 7.0 IRCD Poe · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Arnold mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2025-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Toby Gaynor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Combs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Toby Gaynor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katelyn Marciniak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2025-06-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Toby Gaynor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-06-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Hostetler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
David Harmon / Chris Gunderson
2025-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Philip Dietrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-4, 1-0
W
2025-05-31 · CIN X40 7.0 IRCD Poe · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kate Fisch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 55.6% of games
4.5
40%
10W–15L · 46.3% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 53.3% of games
7.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 59.6% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
63.1%
41W–24L · 56.5% of games
9.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
44 matches
#1 Singles
15%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
18 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert