← Search

Diane Ho

Wailuku, HI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 19W–41L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Diane Ho to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
L
2025-07-27 · #3 Doubles · with Pearl Rockett championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
Cheryl Hay / Becky Miller
2025-07-26 · #3 Doubles · with Tricia Kezeli championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-07-05 · Twilight Zone · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nan Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-06-29 · Twilight Zone · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tricia Kezeli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-06-10 · Twilight Zone · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joanne Quintos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-05-10 · Twilight Zone · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pearl Rockett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-04-26 · Twilight Zone · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nan Li
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-02-09 · Mike's 3.0W · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Des Iorgova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-11-12 · #3 Doubles · with Lore Lee Robello championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-11-11 · #3 Doubles · with Lore Lee Robello championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-07-08 · Tough Stuff · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Boggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2023-06-25 · Tough Stuff · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Corinne Tanabe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
40%
6W–9L · 43.5% of games
3.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 36.1% of games
6.0
90%
9W–1L · 63.4% of games
7.0
11.8%
2W–15L · 27% of games
6.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 37.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova