← Search

Peter Gregory

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 58W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Peter Gregory to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
L
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Sarah Vogel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · HBSQ-Furman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Vogel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-28 · HBSQ-Furman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Vogel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · HBSQ-Mattingly-Nelson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Vogel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-23 · TCSP-Wolfpack-Bridgeman · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · TCSP-Wolfpack-Bridgeman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nathan Hambley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-01 · TCSP-Wolfpack-Bridgeman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geoff Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-14 · NTC-SMACK-Reddy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Pierson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-02-22 · NTC-SMACK-Reddy · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pavel Dolezel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-10 · NTC-SMACK-Reddy · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-03 · NTC-SMACK-Reddy · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-10-26 · BC-Chen 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melissa Kaptik mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
52.9%
36W–32L · 53.4% of games
4.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 42.1% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 54.6% of games
8.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
22 matches
#1 Singles
15%
17 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe